You probably heard that LeBron James, nicknamed “King James,” acted like a spoiled prince after his team was soundly thrashed in game that eliminated his team from the NBA Eastern Conference Finals. It was a crushing disappointment to this 24-year-old superstar whose personal performance was stellar, even heroic.
No one could blame him for wanting to scurry out of the spotlight without congratulating and shaking the hands of the players who beat him.
No one could blame him for wanting to shun the mandatory postgame press conference where he'd be forced to put his pain on display and answer repetitive questions about how the golden team with the best winning record in all of basketball could have been so soundly defeated.
No one could blame him for wanting to avoid his responsibilities. But we can blame him for doing so. Duties often trump desires.
When he failed to acknowledge his opponents, he dishonored the tradition of the game and breached his responsibility as a role model to be gracious in defeat. It’s not simply a matter of sportsmanship; it’s a matter of respect.
When he ditched the league’s mandated press conference, he violated his responsibilities to his teammates (he left them alone to explain the defeat) and to the game that made him a multimillionaire and an international icon.
Later he made things worse.
Ignoring the old adage, “When you’re in a hole, stop digging,” unkingly James dug much deeper with this explanation: “It’s hard for me to congratulate someone after you lose to them. I’m a winner. I’m not being a poor sport. When somebody beats you up, you’re not going to congratulate them. That don’t make sense to me. I’m a competitor. That’s what I do. It doesn’t make sense to shake somebody’s hand.”
In terms of foolishness, the statement is similar to Charles Barkley’s controversial remark in a Nike ad: “I am not a role model. I am not paid to be a role model.”
LeBron seemed to be saying that a guy who’s used to winning, a man with a fierce competitive spirit, can’t be expected to lose with grace or to honor the traditions of his sport by shaking hands with the opponents who beat him. If he’s right, the only athletes bound by the constraints of sportsmanship are those who don’t care about winning as much as LeBron.
This is not only stupid, it isn’t what LeBron really believes. At least it’s not how he’s acted until now. LeBron James has to this point been an outstanding role model. His interactions with the press and other players have revealed a fundamentally good guy, gracious and classy in both defeat and victory.
His clean record, however, doesn’t entitle him to a free pass. He’s too visible, too important to the game. The beating he’s been taking in the press, therefore, is a predictable and proper result demonstrating the moral axiom: “You can avoid your responsibilities, but you can’t avoid the consequences of avoiding your responsibilities.”
That’s okay. He’s got years ahead of him to reclaim his reputation. One bad moment doesn’t make someone a bad person. I hope and expect he’ll make better choices in the future and regain his throne.
This is Michael Josephson reminding you that character counts.
This text version is longer than the audio version.